w o r d s


 

Artist Statement

 

How do we hold memory?  How do memories hold us?  I pose these questions as the starting point for my work, as I strive to embody moments of remembering, and consider the relationship between the body’s physical performance of memory and inscriptive practice.

 

My work deals primarily with imagined microbiological systems rendered on a macro- scale.  I envision and create cells, organs, fluids, and tissues, and seek to assemble the elements into new systems of organic relationship and connection.  I work in a variety of mediums, primarily in drawing and painting, and look for ways to take drawing beyond its traditional definition of “mark on paper.”  I integrate traditional techniques with non-traditional mediums and approaches to create large installation pieces.

 

In this undertaking, I see myself as both scientist and test subject, generating and cataloguing anatomical specimens of emotional engagement.  My drawings originate from deep-seated physical reactions to remembered events.  Paying attention to my own bodily state – rushes of adrenaline, tightening of muscle, knotting of the gut – as I occupy states of recall, I generate figural forms that function as markers, or containers, of lived experience.  My figures are organic and visceral, imagined biologies alluding to an interior dissected and penetrated.  Taking an analytic step back, I arrange, classify, and connect, seeking systems of thought, anatomies of experience.  As part of thinking about the visual culture of science, my work also concerns issues of scale.   I seek to shift the “micro-” to “macro-,” and offer up large-scale visions of microbiological events and spaces as a way to invite the casual viewer into an encompassing visual field.  Cells and organs mirror the proportions of the body, a reflection on the components of the self. 

 

I believe that the act of drawing is a way of residing in multiple states of awareness – of present, past, future – of what one is, has been, and hopes to become – of the physical, the mental, and the formal.  I draw as a way to see more deeply, both inside and out, and to elevate the act of seeing to a process that is fully engaging of both body and mind.  In the gesture of a drawing, there abides the question of how human beings hold memory.  I care about how the body holds its history, and how that recollected history can be performed through the act of making embodied signs.

 

 

 

Excerpt from “Speculating on a Nervous Line” published in Manifest’s International Drawing Annual 2007

 

Body, mind.  Science, magic.  Visible, invisible.  Outside, inside.  Logic, superstition.  Looking for the bridges and betweens.  Is it this or is it that?  Is it both and therefore more?  The Grand Unified Theory in physics looks to strings for answers; perhaps, too, one may look to the line for insight into the bridging of absolutes; to see the drawn line as both an object and an action, a concrete thing that acts as intercessor and point of intersection, as sacrum and site of unconscious projection.  What happens when one draws a line?  Or many lines, in relationship to each other?  What power is held by the marked line to communicate experience, both internal and external?  What does it mean when one declares a drawn line “true” and what are the conditions of this truth – the truth of the moment, of the individual, of the image, of the context in which it is made? 

 

The marked line issues from the body of its maker.  It is a record of a body’s processes and movements, of a mind’s idea, a record of intention and instinct.  The line is a technology, at once a knowing and a making.  It renders, describes, delineates, measures, marks.  A drawn line enables sensations, emotions, and ideas to become manifest, through touch and sight.  It is the fixing of a visceral act in a visual image.  Does the marked line then “make visible the data structures that are our bodies?”  Does the mark serve as a point of transmutation between inward object (the stimulated nerve) and the perceived object (the landscape, the figure, the still life), yielding an image in which we can see both the artist and ourselves? 

 

http://www.manifestgallery.com/nda/index.html

 

 

 

Excerpt from “Marking Time, Figuring Space: Gesture and the Embodied Moment” published in the journal of visual culture, December 2008

 

To draw the memory of the memory – to try to go as far as I can to a sincere space of awareness, striving for what drawing feels like at its peak of freedom, and acting out of what I remember to be an arc of a true connection; it is to break into a new state, one that is a fleeting release from perceived time and expectation.  This is a dance with material and surface, engaging of body and mind, a practice that feels generative, improvised and self-sustaining.  When it works, the passions are layered and palpable, no longer tethered to a discrete moment of recalled crisis but emerging out of the process of memory-making itself.  I can feel my skin flush, I surge with a specific urgency.  Something new is generated from the body’s habit, a gesture to, and informed by, inner life.  The question then turns outward – how can a gesture, once inscribed, be tangibly vitalized beyond the moment of its making?  What new meanings are produced when the bodies of spectators participate in re-figuring the gestural moment?

 

I believe an invitation to a viewer to physically touch and alter a drawing’s surface constitutes one avenue for an ongoing opening of the work.  Points of connection emerge through a network of linked potentials - present to past : emotional pulse to kinesthetic movement : body to material : artwork to viewer : artist to audience : wall to space : gallery to community.  The desire for multidirectional flow between these sites inspires me and feeds the need for a more consciously relational aesthetic.  I now integrate participatory elements into my drawings, sculptural elements that can be manipulated by a viewer, invitations to touch, to make choices, to redirect vision.  My hope is to bring the organ of skin more fully into play, to engage a beholder through more than vision, and mobilize an embodying spectatorship.  A central concern in this work is how to keep the drawing in a state of flux and possibility, and activate a scene in which spectators’ sensations are active across multiple fields of perception. 

 

http://vcu.sagepub.com/

 

 

Featured Artist - University of South Carolina Arts Institute

http://artsinstitute.sc.edu/featuredartist/schneckloth.shtml

 

 

Interview with Leslie Hinton – Memory and Process

http://arthfilm555.blogspot.com/2007/12/sara-schneckloth-questionnaire.html

 

 

 

“Art and Expression – Balancing Technique and Exploration,” International Child and Youth Care Network, Cape Town, South Africa

http://www.cyc-net.org/today2000/today000910.html

 

 

 

“Seeing Trans for the Trees: Rhizomatic Curatorial Frameworks and the Visualizing TRANS Exhibition,” by Amy Noell.  Published in In Visible Culture 2008

http://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/Issue_11/noell/noell.html

 

 

 

Reviews

 

columbiacitypaper.com/ArtsTheatre-Literature/Arts-Coverage/Reactive-Drawings.html

 

www.carolinaarts.com/1008usccolumbia1.html

 

www.ledger-enquirer.com/392/story/353221.html

 

www.dailycardinal.com/article/1098

 

www.artthrob.co.za/01mar/listings-cape.html

 

www.artistswanted.org/sara_schneckloth.html

 

www.thestate.com/weekend/story/550092.html

 

www.madisonmagazine.com/article.php?section_id=918&xstate=view_story&story_id=233874